23 Comments
User's avatar
Samantha Spaulding's avatar

Insightful and incredibly true, thank you for putting this into perspective

Expand full comment
TheLastFarm's avatar

Thank you so much for reading, I’m super grateful 🙏

Expand full comment
Cosmo A. Pieplow's avatar

You make me feel like I’m not insane for always rambling that direct action is the only solution. The only way to change the status quo is going to be uncomfortable, and it’s going to suck.

I guess it’s just sensing who’s going to be down to martyr with me I guess. Even if I am willing to die on a hill, of I die alone nothing will change.

Expand full comment
TheLastFarm's avatar

You’re not insane!

Expand full comment
Cosmo A. Pieplow's avatar

Among friends on substack that i don’t know- im starting to think so! Will 2025 be the year America develops class consciousness beyond a few fringe groups? Let’s pray

Expand full comment
Eliana's avatar

Well said. I’m in LA, my parents and I have been very lucky not to have our house burn down and not to be displaced but it’s been a scary, exhausting few days. We’ll have a lot of work to do here to rebuild with as much healing, equality and sustainability as possible and to do everything possible to make the next disaster less severe and more prepared for, and like you said nobody will do this for us. Thanks for your writing, it gives me hope and ideas in these difficult times 🙏💗

Expand full comment
Amy Yates's avatar

Making it less likely would literally mean not rebuilding all the houses there and focusing on restoring a diverse costal habitat. Maybe a new type of house can be reimagined in burnt spaces but as the article so beautifully points out, it wont because people would have to detach from their ideas around ownership

Expand full comment
Eliana's avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
Claudia Befu's avatar

Sad but true. That’s why I believe that each and every one of us must think what they can do. We can’t wait for a saviour.

Expand full comment
Lynn Cady's avatar

You consistently cut through the BS and tell it like it is. You're right, there will be no wake-up call, for exactly the reasons you discuss. The people who think there WILL be a wake-up call are actually part of the problem because they are still invested in the belief that as soon as enough people get on board, we can work within the system to fix things.

Expand full comment
TheLastFarm's avatar

Thank you Lynn 🙏

Expand full comment
Gálvez Caballero's avatar

Very cool, dual power is required

Expand full comment
Nancy Bruning's avatar

Deep in our souls we know this is true. Deep in my soul when I look at the sky filled with clouds, I wish I were a cloud.

Expand full comment
John Stuckey's avatar

Daniel Quinn used to talk about 'living in the hands of the gods.' In this case, she is Mother Earth. She will do what she needs to do to bring balance back to her planet. A few of us may or may not have the chance to join her in that effort, but it won't be a 'choice,' not really. Nor will those few include folks who now spend countless hours contemplating our predicament. So just be as kind, helpful, loving and present with all who cross your path. That's what we should have always been doing, anyway.

Expand full comment
veegetable's avatar

Hello! Thank you for your posts as always. Climate disaster is scary to hear and think about but I have always found your work to provide insight into what a better world can look like and how we should move forward; something that (as you know) is essential to counteract the overwhelm and despair. This is an invaluable resource.

I have a question for you: I am a city-dweller. I want to start implementing more sustainability and permaculture in my life, but that looks very different from a city apartment than it does from a homestead. Do you have any links or recommendations for where to start with that? Any direction at is gratefully welcomed.

Expand full comment
Leonard Neamtu's avatar

It really feels like this sometimes.

Expand full comment
SUE Speaks's avatar

Instead of “forcing human beings to do something they don't want to do,” which of course won’t happen, there’s changing humanity’s mind from a shared understanding that a thriving humanity, let alone a surviving one, will only come from humanity becoming a cooperative species. We need to become like a family, where humanitarian ends surpass economic ones. That’s what my Substack is all about.

Expand full comment
Axel Ztangi's avatar

"The only possible wake-up call is a mugging. Such a "call" can only come from within human society, and it will have to be an act of extortion. The only way to accomplish that is to make the status quo impossible to maintain, while offering a viable alternative. "

Your musings provoke thoughtful responses. I wonder about the dynamic embodied in your speculations and the two examples that you provide. In your system, to be blunt about it, there is the Power and the Counterpower. But in the circumstances that we are experiencing, e.g. L.A.'s firestorms, there is a Third Force - Climate Change and Civilizational Chaos.

I conceive of a strategy that builds upon the exodus to meaningful lives of a tiny minority precipitated by that Third Force - e.g. small organic farms (& CSAs), mutual aid groups, community-conscious retail (mainly food co-ops and worker- co-ops), alternative energy efforts, and so forth.

The strategy would entail raising funds for the expansion of these efforts based on the history of the Hoedads and the Unemployed Unions during the Depression.

btw In California the unemployed supported the End Poverty in California (EPIC) movement that framed the gubernatorial race of Upton Sinclair. The Depression did act as a kind of Third Force, but one that could be managed more easily than the Climate Chaos we are experiencing.

Expand full comment
PSBaker's avatar

"there is no mechanism for making any change that isn't in the immediate interests of the ruling class. "

I always struggle with double negatives, but don't you mean ... ""there is no mechanism for making any change that IS in the immediate interests of the ruling class. "?

Expand full comment
TheLastFarm's avatar

No. I mean that all existing institutional mechanisms for change only allow for changes that are in the immediate interests of the ruling class. Their interests are necessarily opposed to the interests of both the working class and our ecosystem.

Expand full comment
Adam Cheklat's avatar

Stand with me, and we’ll make it one.

Expand full comment
TheLastFarm's avatar

I talk about that in the piece

Expand full comment